Monday, October 15, 2007

The tipping point

News from HomeThe comments about the end of the Silverfish New Writing series didn't take long in coming. We have heard that discussions have been taking place on several other blog spots too. Our initial decision was not to make any comment, because no matter what we said there would be people unhappy with it. But we realise that we have some really very good friends out there, those who have supported us through the years, believed in what we were trying to do, and who genuinely don't have a personal agenda. So this explanation is for them. (There will be some who still don't 'get it', but that is a risk we take.)

When we were kids we would go swimming at the 'garrison pool'. What we meant by swimming then, was basically splashing about at the shallow end with the occasional foray towards the deep side, holding on to the side rails. Showing off to the girls (notwithstanding our gawky, skinny torsos) and taking them out for heavily sugared drinks or ais-kacang afterwards was the high point of it all. Sometimes we would watch with a mixture of admiration and envy at some people doing the laps, knowing somehow that was what real swimming was about.

When we published Silverfish New Writing 1 in 2001, we said that it would be fantastic if only one or two writers emerged from it. ('Writers' has become a sensitive word -- so henceforth we shall change that to 'authors'.) We reckoned that if we have about fifteen or twenty authors (what is the tipping point, anyway?) producing good stuff regularly, the whole industry would take on a much healthier glow and, perhaps, even attract international attention.

After seven years and seven books in the SNW series and two other anthologies, not one Malaysian 'lapper' has emerged. (Internationally, we only know of Gary Lamoshi, an American living in Hong Kong, whose novel-in-progress was featured in Collateral Damage, and whose full length novel, Hong Kong on Air, has just been published. We are not counting several others who were already published authors before they started sending their work in for SNW.) Yes, the New Writing series has touched many people in many ways and it has resulted in (if we allowed ourselves to be so immodest) a slight seismic shift in the local literary scene. However, no matter how precious we feel about it, it has not produced the desired result. The SNW series, instead of becoming a means, a stepping-stone leading towards an end, has become an end itself. It is seen as a competition, no matter how many times we emphasise that it is not. That, to us, is a bit sad. Results do count. So, instead of behaving like some of our government and quasi-government departments that carry on doing the same thing despite forty or fifty years of abject failure, we have decided to move on. To use a quote from Dan Quayle: if we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure.

We are still, very much, committed to our original vision. The most frequent question we have asked ourselves is, "Why have no 'lappers' emerged from the SNW series?" Are our standards really too high, as some have told us? We think not. If anything, we feel we are no where near the standards we would like to achieve. All we do is to insist on a cetain minimum quality, that's all. Maybe, we cannot simply throw people into the deep end and expect them to start swimming, let alone do the laps. Publishers in this country, especially in the absence of literary agents and such, need to do more. Much more. And that is the philosophy behind our new initiative. This programme is only a year old but we are already coming out with the first book -- three new writers, three different voices, with ten selected stories apiece. The wonderful thing is that, they are all young (in their thirties), they all have full-time galley-slave type day-jobs with absurdly long hours, they are at an advanced stage with their own second book, and they will be the first to admit that they still have a long way to go. And none of them is your 'usual suspect'! For years the media has been asking us about the 'next big thing'. The book, News from Home, should be out at the end of the month. Read it with an open mind and decide.

While writing is about being creative, it is also about being aware of what readers and publishers are looking for (without going into silly areas like instant nirvana, instant health or instant wealth -- we will leave that for others), be it fiction or non-fiction. (We are several light-years away from 'art for the sake of art', so let's not even go there.) Apart from tapping into the genius within, it is about developing a writer’s temperament. It is about digging in. And it is about doing the laps. Publishers cannot simply sit back and wait for it to happen. (Unfortunately most will prefer others to do all the hard work). They can make it happen. But for that they need to work very closely with writers, make long-term commitments (not instant wealth), but without stifling individuality or creativity.

Anyway News from Home, which will be published end of this month or early next, is our first report card. We have decided that this is a far more efficient way of developing local writers than the SNW series, though, admittedly, we will have to confine ourselves to the Klang Valley for the moment. Not everyone will make it, many will drop off, some will not be interested in becoming 'lappers', some will do different forms of writing, and many will be happy being 'splashers'. But that is fine. It is the role, nay the duty even, of the schoolteacher to encourage and work with the weakest students in the class. A publisher is only interested in the top of the class. We make no apologies for that.

If we produce just one, two or three 'lappers' a year, we think we will be working towards that elusive tipping point. We are still hopeful.

Or, are we simply kidding ourselves?

4 comments:

  1. Anonymous12:35 PM

    When did Silverfish start restricting its desire for 'lappers' only to locals? Was it when they ruled us others out of the 'Best of Silverfish' selection? With the initial Silverfish New Writing publications we from other countries seemed to be most welcome, later Silverfish made us feel discriminated. I for one didn't bother submitting again, after realising I didn't qualify (not Malaysian) for possible selection in the 'best'anthology, although Silverfish had published several of my stories and at least one of them had been lauded on publication in the revelant introduction. If it is of any interest, I am a credited 'lapper' who was helped by early publication in several of the Silverfish New Writing volumes - I now have one novel out (under a nom de plume) and another on the way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry that you feel discriminated against. The Best of SNW 2001-2005 says clearly on the cover that it includes 25 Malaysian Short Stories - that is, a Malaysian voice (and some of the writers included are clearly not Malaysian but have lived here long enough). We have plans to produce one consisting of writings about Singapore but so far we have not been able to get a suitable editor. (Since you have chosen to comment anonymously, we do not know where you are from.)

    When the SNW series was started in 2001 it was meant to include only writers from Singapore and Malaysia. But submissions started coming in from all over. So we decided to include them as well (for which we have also been criticised because 'they have more than enough publishers to send their stuff to'). We dare say it raised the bar a little and spurred on local writers to work harder. We appreciate, and are grateful, for that. Anyway, all submissions were evaluated 'blind' by the editors. Identities of the writers were only revealed after the selection. So there, definitely, was no discrimination.

    We are glad that your early inclusion in the series has encouraged you to be a 'lapper' and wish you the very best, but we don't understand why you used a nom de plume - name recognition is everything in writing.

    The primary aim of Silverfish Books is to promote reading and writing in English in Malaysia. We welcome any help towards that end, but we make no apologies for it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous11:30 PM

    From the first Silverfish NW I read, I was spurred on to read all volumes. One of the things i found unique abt the series is the diversity of the stories - diversity in writers and along with it their own unique styles. Not to mention editors differ every year, and with them different "flavours" every yr.
    It rekindled the reading habit which I had almost completely lost over the years. Since then i have gone on to look for other short story series. I may not have read so many, but while searching, titles I would come across would be "Malaysian Short Sories", "Arabic Short Stories", " Japanese Short Stories"...you get the drift. Most collections are like CD albums of a particular artiste - a 'rocker' CD with rock songs, Jazz CD with all that jazz, (again, you get my drift). But Silverfish to me as a reader was like the billboard - the best picks of all genres.
    Perhaps 7 years is too short for "lappers" to appear. Meanwhile, "splashers" could be motivated enough to carry on and rise as those lauded 'lappers" and meanwhile, we could all benefit from good stories which have some standard at least. Stories which a reader enjoys and thinks - "i have stories to be heard too" - and carries on to become a writer himself (or herself). Stories from non-Malaysian writers broaden the range of styles. It also provides great networking and a chance for the Malaysian writer to "hook on" to other networks (and maybe someday reach international level). Everything has to start somewhere

    In having an original goal, so many branches could develop along the way and turn out to be maybe even better than what was originally expected? Why be so guarded as to begin converging just to keep that focus if divergence had reaped desirable benefits? Why not have BOTH your collection of Malaysian writers AND have this wonderful melting pot as well? I guess eventually it all boils down to budget. Money IS the limiting factor isn't it? Sellability. It's a sad truth - for arts. - jh

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:31 AM

    I am a Malaysian, left the beautiful land more than 30 years ago. Every SNW allows me to keep in touch with my roots. So I think SNW serves many important functions (consciously or otherwise), although you may have started out with the objective of nurturing "lappers". It is a wonderful project and I am sad it is ending (but, really??)

    I look forward to your "News from Home", though I have reservations about your statement "The wonderful thing is that, they are all young (in their thirties)". Writers belong to all ages and stages, shapes and sizes, colours and creeds. To be an older writer is wonderful too. I hope your new initiative will celebrate that as well...from mk

    ReplyDelete